• MAIN
  • Podcast
  • Features
    • Where’s My Jetpack?
    • What’s Right – What’s Wrong
    • “I” Candy
    • Real or Fake? (Cheap Shots at Suburbs and Post War Design)
  • Blog
  • Archive
Rational Urbanism
Home » Rational Urbanism » Dead Shopping

Dead Shopping

Malls had begun to kill downtown before I was conscious of either. As I wandered through the streets and alleys of Springfield’s core as a “tween” I couldn’t see the evidence of decline because I had never seen what it had been like when it was truly healthy. In retrospect I was witness to the transition of retail dominance alternating visits to the Eastfield Mall and Baystate West but not knowing that the Woolworth’s at the former was the reason for the vacant building near the latter; I purchased my Rolling Stone 

T-shirt just the same.

There may have been a toy store downtown, in later years there was one inside Johnson’s Bookstore, but I bought all my HO toy train stuff at the Kay Bee Toy and Hobby at the mall. 

What did I buy downtown? Records at Belmont Records, “food” at the Orange Julius, Friendly’s, or at the deli in the food court. I enjoyed being downtown more, but I spent more of my paper route money at the mall. 

By the time I was living downtown with my wife and, eventually, two daughters 10 years later I could wait for Christmas Eve to do all of my shopping at a mildly bustling, but not too busy Steiger’s and the aforementioned Johnson’s. They would both be gone before my daughters could shop in them as tweens. 

I remember a glorious trip to a short lived would be replacement for those two venerable stores with my oldest, Xela: We wandered from the Classical Condominium down to whatever that pseudo-TJ/Marshalls/K-mart/ seconds shop was called and bought two arms full of art-work, pillows, lamps and assorted crap for her “new” bedroom; we were giving the girls separate rooms for the first time. On the way down we heard people speaking English, Spanish, Russian, and Vietnamese. On the way back we had a burger at a little diner in the SIS building. 

The crappy, pseudo department store has since been replaced by a storefront college. The burger place is a print shop.

On Thursday 12 year old LuLu and I got a chai tea (her) and a hot chocolate at Kringle Candle as the early snow made us both feel as though we had given Thanksgiving a miss and had jumped right in to Christmas time. We bought her mom two little gifts. We saw workers just starting the job of getting the outdoor skating rink ready. 

Downtown is on its umpteenth iteration of creating a new storefront paradigm. It never ends. What was a family owned furniture store becomes a Family Dollar on one side, and a little family owned department store on the other. The small building next door was razed for parking but the lot sits completely empty except for the owner’s SUV 100% of the time; anyone with a car can get to a better place to shop. I bet they regret not having more space for inventory now, especially since they wouldn’t need to pay anyone to plow their shelves of excess inventory when it snows.

Eastfield Mall is dead. I haven’t been there in years. The owners have widely published a plan to make the area which was the mall a “town center”. It’s far enough from downtown to become the center of its own pseudo neighborhood I suppose. Is there demand enough for living in that sort of place in such a slow growing region as western New England? Perhaps, it is moderately well serviced by public transit and is surrounded by healthy Springfield neighborhoods as well as other thriving towns. On the other hand Springfield’s “other Main Street”, Main Street in Indian Orchard, has great bones, a nice layout, and could be (and for my money should be) the center of that same area miles to the east of downtown Springfield. I’m not sure there’s energy enough for both of them.

Another mall just across the Connecticut line, just as close to downtown Springfield as Eastfield Mall but to the south, is all but dead; it was valued at close to 300 million dollars just over a decade ago but is up for sale for just about a penny on the dollar today.

What this all portends for downtown I don’t think anyone can say for sure; the decline of the old nemesis does not guarantee a return to health. Having witnessed so much of this one particular rivalry play out all of my financial and emotional investment is for the traditional downtown to continue to survive somehow by making itself at least somewhat useful to someone in some way at least some of the time.

« Meeting-up with Chris
Grinding my Gears »

4 thoughts on “Dead Shopping”

  1. Johnny says:
    November 18, 2018 at 11:01 am

    The dynamics you describe in Springfield are identical to what I see in towns all over the country. There’s a continuous building of new stuff that doesn’t add to the old, but replaces it. It doesn’t take long before the new thing is fully amortized and depreciated from an investment standpoint. Then the buildings work their way down the value chain to wig shop, evangelical ministry, and ethnic mom and pop restaurant until they’re all finally vacant. Rinse. Repeat. This is a consequence of tax policy, zoning regulations, building codes, and a long list of government subsidies designed to encourage “growth.” So we get lots of “growth” as well as a trail of semi abandoned neighborhoods as new investment moves on to the new new thing. If we want longer lasting more durable towns we’ll need to change all of the above. I’m not holding my breath. Shrug.

    Reply
    • Steve says:
      November 18, 2018 at 11:27 am

      What I see as different…”un-shrug” is that the downtown/South End/Main Street is surviving with minimal inputs(a new wall here, a new entrance there) and hasn’t lost much, if any, value. The malls are sink holes into which investors may, or may not, plow millions and millions of dollars for a really iffy return. In areas like DC, New York, or maybe the Bay Area these retrofits might make sense…this is where I shrug…don’t give a f#<€...around here I only see one "winner"; slightly battered, somewhat hollowed out, significantly worse for wear in some cases, but it will be at least some of the Main Streets built 75-380 years ago! On the way to the house in which I was raised to visit my nephew, who lives in the old homestead now, I see every storefront occupied and filled with people: all ethnic minorities to be sure but actually engaging in face to face commerce. These were all either trolley stop one story "temporary" commercial buildings (built 100+ years ago) or homes converted to storefronts in the crudest possible ways. There are 5 commercial strips on that 2 mile trip ranging from one stand alone bodega to a center with 20+ shops where three streets converge.

      Reply
  2. Johnny says:
    November 18, 2018 at 1:55 pm

    I spent many years straining to understand how our towns are build – rules, regulations, political and cultural blah, blah, blah. I participated in professional groups – Congress for New Urbanism, Strong Towns, YIMBYs, etc. Then I went out in the world, bought property, and attempted to implement these changes. I failed. Totally. So… begrudging I came to the conclusion that either I was a complete idiot (the prevailing consensus) or that all the institutional frameworks were incapable of reform and aren’t going to change in a time frame that will be relavent to me. In other words… I’ll be dead before traditional Main Street towns are legal again. That’s where the shrugging starts.

    I have two options as an individual. I can live in one of the pre-existing older places that already has good bones with the understanding that I can’t tinker too much with the buildings without opening a can or worms with the local authorities. Or I can inhabit the less interesting newer suburban landscape and quietly adapt it in mostly non physical ways to suit my specific needs. At the moment I’m doing both.

    Reply
  3. Greg says:
    November 19, 2018 at 10:56 am

    The vibrant downtowns that I’m familiar with in the South are all anchored by restaurants and entertainment (concert halls, movie theaters, outdoor events of all kinds). There are shops, but they seem to get business as an add-on to the entertainment/restaurants rather than being a destination in themselves in most cases.

    It’s difficult for downtown to compete for shoppers with the big box stores in suburbia. It makes sense to let them do what they do well.

    Downtown’s secret weapon for restaurant success is outdoor dining. People LOVE to eat outdoors, but not in a suburban parking lot. Downtown on a pedestrianized street is the perfect setting for eating outside, but an extra-wide sidewalk works well too. If your restaurants aren’t taking advantage, they need to be hit over the head until they do.

    Reply

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 121 other subscribers

[Valid RSS]
February 2019
S M T W T F S
« Jan    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Archives

Recent Comments

  • John Thomas on Walking in not Memphis
  • Johnny on Nyack. So Nyack!
  • irrational_urbanist on Watch Your Gimbals
  • Neil on Walking in not Memphis
  • Brian M on Watch Your Gimbals
© Rational Urbanism - Hammerfold Media